There are a few other factors we should be aware
of as well—human factors that we all can fall
victim to, but which we can usually control if we
are aware of them.
Leniency or
Stringency:
This is a tendency to rate candidates too severely
(so that none of them meet your exacting criteria)
or being too easy on them.
Halo/Horn Effect:
If the candidate before the candidate you are
interviewing was very good -- or very bad, this
can radically influence your rating and perception
of the candidate you are PRESENTLY interviewing.
This is the 'halo effect'.
It's like having to give a speech in a wedding
- just AFTER the best speaker in the room has
spoken. Your speech may be very good but
unfortunately people will tend to judge it
subconsciously against what they have just heard.
As an interviewer, try not to make this mistake.
Other examples are where attractive candidates
are viewed more favorably than unattractive
candidates; or tall candidates are seen as more
proficient than short candidates.
Error of Central
Tendency:
This is our tendency to give average marks to most
candidates. Nobody wants to go out on a limb.
Primacy-regency
effect:
Be aware of what psychologists call the
'Primacy-regency effect'. This is where most
interviewers remember, what happens at the
beginning and at the end of the interview, but
tend to forget what happens in the middle. So give
the candidate an even break by considering his
entire 'performance'.
Stereotyping:
A male who applies for what is predominantly
considered a female position has to be twice as
good to get the position
|